On May 1, 2025, Forever 21 officially closed all 354 of its U.S. stores. This marked the end of an era for one of America’s most recognizable fast-fashion retailers. The closures followed the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in March. It was the brand’s second filing in six years, after failing to secure a buyer or restructure its business amid mounting financial pressures.
The Fall of a Fast-Fashion Giant
Forever 21’s decline was driven by a combination of internal missteps and external market forces. The brand struggled to adapt to the rise of ultra-fast fashion competitors like Shein and Temu. These companies leveraged low-cost, direct-to-consumer models and benefited from the now-defunct “de minimis” tax exemption. That exemption allowed imports under $800 to enter the U.S. duty-free.
As a result, Forever 21 faced increased competition from these agile online retailers, leading to declining sales and profitability. The company’s inability to pivot quickly to e-commerce and its reliance on large brick-and-mortar stores further exacerbated its challenges.
Impact of Trump’s Tariffs on Fast Fashion
The closure of Forever 21 coincided with significant changes in U.S. trade policy. On May 2, 2025, the U.S. government officially ended the “de minimis” exemption, imposing tariffs of up to 145% on low-value imports from China. This policy shift was part of former President Donald Trump’s broader tariff strategy. It directly impacted e-commerce giants like Shein and Temu, which had relied on the exemption to offer ultra-low-cost items.
While the new tariffs aimed to bolster domestic retailers by leveling the playing field, they also led to increased prices for consumers. They also created operational challenges for fast-fashion companies. Some retailers, including Shein and Temu, responded by raising prices or altering their supply chains. Others, like Space NK and Understance, halted U.S. shipments altogether.
The Future of Fast Fashion
The combination of Forever 21’s closure and the imposition of new tariffs signals a potential shift in the fast-fashion industry. Consumers may increasingly turn to secondhand retailers, clothing rental services, or domestic brands that can offer more sustainable and ethically produced options.
However, industry experts caution that while tariffs may reduce the influx of cheap, fast-fashion items, they are unlikely to significantly alter consumer behavior without broader cultural and production shifts. The long-term impact of these changes on the fast-fashion industry’s environmental footprint and economic sustainability remains to be seen.
As the retail landscape continues to evolve, the demise of Forever 21 serves as a cautionary tale for brands that fail to adapt to changing market dynamics and consumer preferences.
What do you think this means for the future of fast fashion—will rising costs push shoppers toward sustainability, or is low-cost style here to stay? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.
Follow MEFeater on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and Pinterest.
